Friday, May 13, 2011

Remembering Ellis H. Parker (The American Sherlock Holmes) is featuring an excellent story on an individual that PardonPower has been thinking about for years, the "American Sherlock Holmes," one Ellis H. Parker. More specifically, the piece, written by Danielle Camilla, focuses on the grandson of Parker, Andrew Sahol, who is "methodically piecing together a mystery in search of the truth."

Sahol is also attempting to land one of those ever-so-popular posthumous pardons for his grandfather - something which was sought almost immediately following the great detective's death while serving out a six-year federal prison sentence with his son, Ellis H. Parker, Jr. (who was pardoned by Harry Truman). Mr. Sahol now claims to have "documented proof" that Ellis H. Parker was "framed."

Parker (who was actually the father of 15) and son were convicted for the kidnapping, torture and forced confession of Paul Wendel, suspected by Parker as being responsible for the 1932 kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby. The "official" investigation, however, was directed by the head of the New Jersey State Police.H. Norman Schwarzkopf, Sr. In dramatic fashion, Parker insisted early on that the body eventually found in a wooded area was not that of the Lindbergh child, and that the arrest of Bruno Richard Hauptmann was a mistake. Hauptmann, of course, was eventually executed.

Sahol says he has uncovered information which renders the conviction the result of a "fix." So, Sahol has applied for a presidential pardon twice. He says he never heard anything back re the first application. The Bush administration informed him that it was not considering posthumous pardons - even though it did eventually grant one to Charlie Winters. Sahol is now hoping the remarkably stingy president Obama will work with him. To read more about this fascinating detective, see this well-written story here.

Incidentally, the lead prosecutor in Parker's case (John J. Quinn) indicated that he would support a posthumous pardon for Ellis H. Parker, as did the presiding judge (Judge William Clark). The judge was concerned, however, as to whether or not there was legal precedent for such a pardon. Back then, at the federal level, there was not. Today, however, thanks to Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, there is.

1 comment:

Col Mosby said...

After examining the totally corrupt behavior of Parker in the Lindbergh case, motivated by his rage at not being included in the investigation by Schwarzkopf, one feels the need to re-examine Parker's record as a person who "solved" crimes. Certainly his stated beliefs about details of the Lindbergh case indicated either an incompetent detective or a reprehensible liar(claiming the baby was not Lindbergh's based on Parker's mistaken belief that the child's height was not correct, and various other factors, totally ignorig the enormous amount of evidence that conclusively proved the baby to be Lindbergh'). His kidnapping and torture of a disbarred attorney, forcing him to confess he kidnapped the Lindbergh baby, leads one to question Parker's sanity. How in the world did he expect to get a conviction when there wasn't a shred of evidence that connected him to the kidnapping, while there was far more than enough against Huaptmannn tohave convicted him 10 times over? Only a fool can be skeptical about Hauptmann's guilt, such a the teller of tale tales, Scaduto, and others out to make a buck by taking advantage of their reader's lack of knowledge about the case. I suspect that many of Parker's convictions may have come about as a result of torture of some suspect. His behavior in the Lindbergh case gives one plenty of doubts about Parker's supposed brilliant detective work. I would welcome research into the career of Parker. I expect that his reputation would suffer pretty horribly.

blogger templates | Make Money Online