Friday, January 25, 2013
The presidential exercise of the pardon power, or lack thereof, has been the subject of national conversation in recent months. As Margaret Colgate Love describes in her Issue Brief, this much discussed, but not often used, executive power and process "has lost its vigor, its integrity, and its sense of purpose.” The latest assessments of the federal pardon process suggest a process plagued by racial and class disparities, and in at least one case, misconduct on the part of the Pardon Attorney.
Rather than "live with a dysfunctional pardon process," Love identifies state pardon models that the President and federal justice system could adopt. Highlighted for their “authority,” “accountability,” and "transparency," Love explains that these models are necessary responses to the "hard to understand and even harder to penetrate, operating in secret and accountable to no one" Justice Department Pardon Office. According to Love, “there is not a single state whose pardon process is as poorly conceived and managed as the federal government’s.” The process must “evolve with the changing needs of the presidency and of the justice system,” Love concludes.
Read the full Issue Brief here.