|Mitch Daniels: Short on Mercy|
Take former Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, for example. He granted a mere 62 pardons in 8 years. More than 200 applications came in, and his State's Board Parole Board recommended clemency for others that Daniels denied. Now, it is discovered that, just before he left office, Daniels
... pardoned Anthony Nefouse [the] nephew of a [high] school classmate; his uncle had contributed $13,000 to Daniels' campaigns. And a former Daniels administration cabinet member submitted the petition and testified at the pardon hearing. Nefouse, now 37, pleaded guilty in 1997 to conspiracy to deal in cocaine, a Class B felony, and received a 12-year suspended sentence with six years of probation. [The] felony conviction meant he couldn't volunteer and participate in some of his sons' activities. It also prevented him from being certified as a financial planner or obtaining a real estate license.Daniels has admitted that he "recognized" the clemency applicant's name, but it is reported that he "wasn't aware of the contributions." Indeed, Daniels claims that fact that he knew Nefouse actually "worked against him" (discuss among yourselves). Says the Chronicle:
Nefouse's felony charge was one of the highest-level offenses for which Daniels granted pardons. Only 11 of his 62 pardons were drug-related. Only three — including the Nefouse case — involved selling drugs.So, there you have it. A governor stingy with clemency, grants a pardon to an acquaintance, the relative of a campaign contributor, right before he leaves office. Was clemency deserved? Perhaps. But it seems fair enough to wonder, what made this application more special than 150 or so others? Was it really the most outstanding of that bunch? No one else was more deserving? Really? See Chronicle article here.